Attempting to appeal or argue against a traffic fine can be tempting, especially if you truly feel that you haven’t done anything wrong. After all, the police are only human, and it’s possible for them to make mistakes just like anyone else.
If you’re considering appealing against a traffic or speeding fine, you should speak to a criminal lawyer to discuss your options – especially if the infringement that you’re appealing is somewhat serious. Experienced criminal lawyers, such as Criminal Lawyers Perth, will be able to advise you on the best course of action, advising you on the chance of successful appeal and telling you if you realistically have no chance of success. If you need a list of lawyers in your local area, check out Lawyerslist.
Different States Have Different Processes For Appealing Traffic Fines
Australia is a big country, and every state has its own set of road rules and procedures. This means that every state also has its own set of infringements and penalties for each offence, and that the process for fighting an infringement therefore varies with state.
With this in mind, it’s important to always speak with a legal expert to discuss your options. Don’t take advice from the net as concrete, and make sure that you do some research before committing to an appeal.
According to experienced criminal lawyers, Culshaw Miller Criminal Lawyers, the arresting officer’s testimony in any DUI case can be devastating. It’s important to mitigate their impact to achieve desirable results at trial. The following tips are easy to set up, inexpensive, and will hopefully achieve their goal of bringing balance to the arresting officer’s testimony.
The Walk and Turn Test: A DUI arrest can be the most stressful point in a person’s life. The impending cost and possible incarceration is enough to make anyone a basket case. As such, the entire event will tend to evoke extreme anxiety in any defendant and in turn cause their bodies to function abnormally. This is particularly true with the so-called “Walk and Turn” Test where the motorist must keep his arms at his side and walk heal-to-toe for a certain distance, make a turn, and then walk back to the officer. The test is not done correctly if the person uses their outstretched arms for balance. The key is to ask the officer whether “nervousness” is considered when failing a motorist on the Walk and Turn test. The officer will likely respond that nervousness is not taken into account, the test is the test no matter what the emotional state of the motorist. Next, ask the officer if he were to suspend a two-by-four between two ten story buildings, and then attempt to walk across it whether he would outstretch his arms for balance. If he’s honest, he’ll say “yes”. If not, he’ll say no and the jury will disregard his testimony completely.